Watched is not understood
A finished progress bar tells you the file played. It does not tell you the learner could do the task.
Interactive video for training
Put knowledge checks inside the video, then keep a per-learner record of what each person watched, answered, and completed.
The training gap
Video is the cheapest way to deliver training and the hardest way to evidence it. Three things break in the same place.
A finished progress bar tells you the file played. It does not tell you the learner could do the task.
Quiz scores arrive days later, so remediation happens after the shift, the audit, or the incident.
Completion sits in the LMS, answers in a form tool, and acknowledgements in email threads.
What changes
Three things the video itself starts doing once the interactions are on the timeline.
Completion
Require the interaction, not just the playback, so a completion means the learner actually took part.
Comprehension
Ask the question where the concept is introduced, and score the answer while the learner is still in the material.

Records
Every view produces a row you can export, so the evidence outlasts the person who ran the session.
What gets measured
Customer example
A hydrogen leak procedure built as a decision path: the learner chooses an action, the video branches to the consequence, and hotspots hold the reference documents.

Training use case directory
Each of these has its own compliance shape, its own audit trail, and its own page.
Run role-specific orientation with policy acknowledgements and first-week checks.
Explore →Validate procedures with hotspots, assessments, and proof of completion before site access.
Explore →Put staff inside phishing and password scenarios and score the response.
Explore →Deliver clinical modules with tracked participation and CEU-ready completion data.
Explore →Use scenario branches so choices, not slides, reveal bias and better responses.
Explore →Let managers practise reviews, feedback, and conflict before the conversation is live.
Explore →Give customers self-guided product tutorials that answer and route on their own.
Explore →Coach reps on product knowledge and objections with branching practice paths.
Explore →Training FAQ
The objections that come up in every evaluation, answered plainly.
Yes. Mindstamp reports completion and score over SCORM and xAPI, so modules sit in the LMS your compliance team already reports from.
No. Learners open a link or an embed. You can still capture their identity, answers, and completion without provisioning anyone.
Yes. Seeking can be disabled and progress can be gated on a correct answer, so the module cannot be completed by dragging the scrubber.
Captions, keyboard operation, and screen reader labels are supported on the player and on every interaction, so modules meet the same standard as the rest of your training.
No. Interactions are layered on top of the file you already have. The original is never re-encoded or replaced.
Per-view records persist in your account and export at any time, so evidence survives staff changes and audit cycles.
Start with one module
Take the onboarding or safety video you already have and see what it reports back after ten learners.